Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230615
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '23 at 07:43
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 755 73% 599 Pts	64-Core 1,060 66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 158 151 151 143 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 496 Write 155 Mixed 195 SusWrite 151 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 31.8 120% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 153 123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 129%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$54 5,596 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 931GB free Firmware: KA05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 134 133 135 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 134 Write 125 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 134 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 643GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 151 150 151 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 140 Write 156 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 150 84% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 28.6 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.3 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 26.2 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	17	144	0"	1920 1080

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	876x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	839x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,018

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16