Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$75
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 117
56% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 294
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 37
29% 37.3 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 26.5
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 200 205 229 208 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 448
Mixed 314
SusWrite 213
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 46.9
156% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 256
189% 247 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 114%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
418GB free
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 299 277 318 324 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 484
Write 413
Mixed 410
SusWrite 294
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 34.3
133% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 147
136% 209 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 102%
Corsair Neutron NX500 NVMe PCIe 800GB-$637
601GB free
Firmware: E7FM04.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 501 471 545 563 549 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 810
Mixed 730
SusWrite 498
160% 712 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 41.9
138% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 459
340% 450 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 126%
Great: 233%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
96GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 117 58 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68% Good
Read 484
Write 341
Mixed 314
SusWrite 82.6
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 29.6
108% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 169
144% 212 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 19.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 13.5
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 217 60 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback