HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201102
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 22:34
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 914
87% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,336
83% 1,336 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 103
Parallax 106
92% 107 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 97.8
Splatting 88.1
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 251 69 83 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 430
Mixed 936
SusWrite 148
152% 690 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 48.2
184% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 559
425% 577 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 141%
Great: 190%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
659GB free
Firmware: HPH5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 181 185 182 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 74.5
Write 78.7
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 182
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate FA GoFlex Pro 500GB
466GB free, PID 5161
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 55.1
Write 29.9
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 34.3
45% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 18%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
373GB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 64 64 62 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 44.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 62.7
68% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 32.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 27.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 3R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 30% 20 215 59 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0945 T27B350
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback