Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics237% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive389% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus WS C422 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory46.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 20:50
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2255
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 956
87% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,581
98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Nvidia(10DE 1618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
237% Outstanding
Lighting 356
Reflection 308
Parallax 396
290% 353 fps
MRender 373
Gravity 307
Splatting 204
231% 294 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 237%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2079 2164 2182 2206 2200 1791 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,504
Write 2,232
Mixed 2,028
SusWrite 2,104
499% 2,217 MB/s
4K Read 74
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 110
364% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1130
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 1,047
789% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 389%
This bench: 389%
Great: 666%
Solidigm SSDPFKKW020X7 2TB
757GB free
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2128 2210 2136 1709 1606 1623 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,579
Write 2,223
Mixed 2,072
SusWrite 1902
493% 2,194 MB/s
4K Read 74.4
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 108
364% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,183
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1,088
813% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 307%
This bench: 381%
Great: 648%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
16GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 485
Mixed 461
107% 478 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 56.7
189% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: 20RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 365 363 370 363 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 404
Mixed 286
SusWrite 370
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 33.1
141% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 167
174% 288 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 118%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
8GB free, PID b064
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.8
Write 82.2
Mixed 71.3
102% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.7
230% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 30.9
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 10.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 8 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC2956 CS2420
Typical WS C422 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $102
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback