Asrock B85M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 14:51
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 187
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 479
52% 410 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 52.6
46% 56.3 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 48.8
41% 50.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 340 336 339 337 342 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 368
Mixed 396
SusWrite 337
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 52
145% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 426 414 401 411 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 444
Mixed 412
SusWrite 410
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 47.6
156% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 26 170 26.9" 2560 1377 GBT270D M27Q
Typical B85M Pro3 Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback