Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 270E5J/2570EJ  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E5J-XD2BR
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 05:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 126
54% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 184
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C737) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.7
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42059100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 136 121 118 126 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 429
Write 389
Mixed 397
SusWrite 162
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 30.3
104% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 41.4
81% 166 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMO15A3
Typical 270E5J/2570EJ Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback