Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.3% Average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 72.2 35% 54.9 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 218 22% 179 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 15 30 38 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 98%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 9GB free, PID 6310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 17 17 17 17 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	7.57% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 15.2 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 15.2 15% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 160GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 124%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	24	13	9	64	0"	1296 768

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples	4x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon X55501stBench 66%, 1,356 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	1x
GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
LOGICAL VOLUME 525GBHPBench 66%, 2 samples	1x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16