TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 20:10
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 325
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 904
96% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 C726)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 156
Parallax 156
130% 157 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 133
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
703GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 1914 2051 2214 600 285 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1,878
Write 2,342
Mixed 1,593
SusWrite 1,479
411% 1,823 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 72.7
239% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 582
529% 818 MB/s
Poor: 170% ↑
This bench: 281%
 Great: 348%
Lexar NS100 1TB
787GB free
Firmware: SN13132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 438 450 427 431 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 473
Mixed 388
SusWrite 442
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 45.2
163% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 316
228% 293 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 110%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
351GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 164 170 175 176 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 114
SusWrite 171
197% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 66.8%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AG16GB32C16X4UB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 30.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 31.6
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 90.5%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 34" 2752 1152 XMI3444 Mi Monitor
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-A520M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 5500AMD  $80Bench 86%, 3,830 samples12x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples10x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples8x
GPU
RTX 4060Nvidia  $293Bench 122%, 48,534 samples5x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples5x
RX 6650-XTAMDBench 110%, 4,246 samples5x
SSD
CT1000P3SSD8 1TBBench 268%, 44,174 samples4x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples4x
SNV2S500G 500GBKingstonBench 233%, 18,653 samples3x
RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $39Bench 84%, 32,187 samples4x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback