Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 191
2-Core 386
117% 222 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,252
122% 1,001 Pts
64-Core 2,210
137% 2,210 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 122
Parallax 128
113% 130 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 106
Splatting 91
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1783 757 282 189 331 343 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1,677
Write 1938
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 614
335% 1,488 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 103
352% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,581
DQ Write 1,529
DQ Mixed 1,236
1,016% 1,449 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 283%
Great: 295%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
48GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 137 123 116 108 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 164
Write 145
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 122
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 1.1
24% 8.17 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 39%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
71GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 126
Write 108
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 82.7
22% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.1
61% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
3% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
228GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 99 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 154
Write 130
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 101
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 101%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 24 19 21 18 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 132
Write 32.3
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 19.8
57% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.7
129% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AG16GB32C16X4UB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 36.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback