Asrock B85M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 171
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 531
52% 428 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 66.5
57% 69.3 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 65.5
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 430 453 459 358 348 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 433
Mixed 395
SusWrite 413
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 47.1
155% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 417 430 436 439 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 463
Mixed 437
SusWrite 434
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 47.9
164% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 347
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 16.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 25% 55 361 66 60 26.9" 2560 1440 GBT270D M27Q
Typical B85M Pro3 Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback