Asus H110M-K X

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K X (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$88 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 210 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 374 46% 352 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.1% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 104 Parallax 106 79% 102 fps	MRender 92.8 Gravity 95.1 Splatting 92.6 76% 93.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft 가상 디스크 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 149 151 149 141 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.8% Very good	Read 407 Write 291 Mixed 296 SusWrite 145 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 30.9 122% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 244 206% 298 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 77%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 17GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 482 Write 319 Mixed 300 81% 367 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 38.2 157% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 247 212% 314 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 369GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 60 66 84 88 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.3% Average	Read 70.2 Write 56.9 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 71.8 49% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 4.2 698% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB 3,609 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 22.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	41	144	31.6"	1280 720	INN0032 X323C144

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K X Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K X

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $88Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	11x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	7x
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	4x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	2x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	2x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359