Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 07:54
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 350
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,187
112% 929 Pts
64-Core 1,606
99% 1,606 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 269
Reflection 253
Parallax 274
219% 265 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 223
Splatting 172
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M470 1TB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,152
Write 3,748
Mixed 2,339
619% 2,746 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 82.6
282% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,736
DQ Write 1,424
DQ Mixed 944
880% 1,368 MB/s
Poor: 207% Great: 504%
Adata LEGEND 840 1TB
88GB free
Firmware: 1.2.3.P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,669
Write 4508
Mixed 2,888
756% 3,355 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 63
328% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 61.5
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 163
275% 495 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 518%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2668 2668 2670 2668 2661 2666 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 2,561
Write 2,642
Mixed 2,439
SusWrite 2,667
582% 2,577 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 100
306% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,472
DQ Write 1,319
DQ Mixed 1,413
1,055% 1,401 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 424%
Great: 435%
Hitachi HUH72808CLAR8000 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: M7K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 44 44 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64% Good
Read 179
Write 42
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 44.3
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
TEAM T25 31TB
334GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 28.7
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 3
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 12.6
696% 12.7 MB/s
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
791GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 53.9
Write 28.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 26.6
42% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 43%
SPCC 2.5 ¡± SSD 1TB
83GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0 0 1.6 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
Read 54
Write 28.8
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 1.5
34% 29 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 11.4
663% 12.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000Z40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 76
MC Write 56.4
MC Mixed 61.3
184% 64.6 GB/s
SC Read 62.2
SC Write 54.6
SC Mixed 52.8
162% 56.5 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 178%
Great: 304%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 64.5" 1280 720 VIZ1040 P65Q9-J01
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback