Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 453
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.1% Good
Lighting 90
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 79.2
73% 86.5 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 81
Splatting 73.3
61% 74.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 401 424 192 191 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 363
Mixed 360
SusWrite 253
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 40.1
147% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 229
205% 310 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91%
Great: 105%
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 363 363 369 368 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 843
Write 495
Mixed 658
SusWrite 360
131% 589 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 47.4
159% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 627
483% 650 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 135%
Great: 164%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
319GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 352 362 378 378 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 1,391
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 412
254% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 58.7
192% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,206
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 1020
728% 945 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 185%
Great: 271%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 209 208 211 209 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 8945 NMUD480E85-3000D CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 32GB
2747, 2747, 2747, 2747 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 31.5" 1280 720 TCL0000 32S327
Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback