Acer Aspire XC-1760

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-1760  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-1760
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 19:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 24.9
1-Core 174
2-Core 310
83% 170 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,023
97% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,194
74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Acer(1025 1572) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 7.5
5% 8.77 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 8.9
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1690
Write 1,787
Mixed 1,358
360% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.8
194% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 956
713% 947 MB/s
Poor: 217% Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 7.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 6.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 19 60 27" 2560 1440 DEL4277 DELL U2723QE
Typical Aspire XC-1760 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-1760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback