Medion P67083

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion P67083  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 17:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 684
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 194
Parallax 212
171% 205 fps
MRender 295
Gravity 168
Splatting 127
153% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 152%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12S-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS4 1TB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1191 1017 1016 1070 1040 814 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1292
Write 1872
Mixed 1,628
SusWrite 1,025
329% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 63.8
205% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 679
508% 679 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 209%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 144 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5BB2 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical P67083 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion P67083

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback