TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 480%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics382% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '23 at 13:23
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 215
2-Core 428
128% 245 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,597
146% 1,225 Pts
64-Core 2,001
124% 2,001 Pts
Poor: 97% ↑
This bench: 126%
 Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
382% Outstanding
Lighting 617
Reflection 570
Parallax 689
502% 625 fps
MRender 512
Gravity 553
Splatting 292
354% 452 fps
Poor: 303% ↑
This bench: 382%
 Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B00 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2538 468 442 444 451 457 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 3,041
Write 2,543
Mixed 2385
SusWrite 800
490% 2,192 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 99.2
363% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,786
DQ Write 1,532
DQ Mixed 1,682
1,254% 1,667 MB/s
Poor: 146% ↑
This bench: 356%
 Great: 366%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
847GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2912 3246 2959 1795 1779 1780 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 2,765
Write 3,092
Mixed 3,044
SusWrite 2,412
639% 2,828 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 93.6
307% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,869
DQ Write 1,685
DQ Mixed 1,810
1,349% 1,788 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑
This bench: 432%
 Great: 488%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
891GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 173 180 165 178 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 137
Write 163
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 171
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 88.6%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
195% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 73.4
MC Mixed 73.6
202% 70.6 GB/s
SC Read 59.3
SC Write 71.7
SC Mixed 64.5
186% 65.2 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 195%
 Great: 207%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 27.4" 1280 720 DELA179 Dell AW2721D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $310Bench 117%, 4,385 samples37x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $219Bench 112%, 4,548 samples25x
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD  $490Bench 114%, 3,143 samples11x
GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia  $1,760Bench 370%, 25,956 samples28x
RX 7900-XTXAMD  $1,000Bench 257%, 5,548 samples10x
RTX 4080Nvidia  $970Bench 290%, 22,998 samples8x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples17x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $155Bench 416%, 138,083 samples9x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $169Bench 460%, 45,230 samples9x
RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 190%, 9,902 samples15x
F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 176%, 6,345 samples14x
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback