TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 455%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 478%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics380% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 08:20
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$231
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 215
2-Core 430
128% 245 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,618
147% 1,236 Pts
64-Core 2,012
124% 2,012 Pts
Poor: 97% ↑
This bench: 126%
 Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
380% Outstanding
Lighting 608
Reflection 560
Parallax 687
496% 618 fps
MRender 521
Gravity 552
Splatting 293
356% 455 fps
Poor: 303% ↑
This bench: 380%
 Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B00 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,022
Write 2,551
Mixed 2,378
590% 2,650 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 110
384% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,786
DQ Write 1,551
DQ Mixed 1,686
1,259% 1,674 MB/s
Poor: 146% Great: 366%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
847GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3244 3239 2881 1782 1790 1772 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
437% Outstanding
Read 2,806
Write 3,166
Mixed 3,047
SusWrite 2,451
648% 2,868 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 95.7
309% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,879
DQ Write 1,682
DQ Mixed 1,803
1,346% 1,788 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑
This bench: 437%
 Great: 488%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
901GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 170 165 167 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 177
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 166
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 93.2%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
191% Outstanding
MC Read 63
MC Write 72
MC Mixed 72
197% 69 GB/s
SC Read 57.6
SC Write 71.1
SC Mixed 63.9
183% 64.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 191%
 Great: 207%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 27.4" 1280 720 DELA179 Dell AW2721D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $310Bench 117%, 4,385 samples37x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $231Bench 112%, 4,548 samples24x
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD  $490Bench 114%, 3,143 samples11x
GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia  $1,756Bench 370%, 25,956 samples28x
RX 7900-XTXAMD  $1,000Bench 257%, 5,548 samples10x
RTX 4080Nvidia  $970Bench 290%, 22,998 samples8x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples17x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $155Bench 416%, 138,083 samples9x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $170Bench 460%, 45,230 samples9x
RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 190%, 9,902 samples14x
F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 176%, 6,345 samples14x
F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 166%, 17,639 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback