HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 198E
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190424
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '23 at 21:50
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 97 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 340 46% 343 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1361 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.6% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 36.6 Parallax 11.1 27% 27 fps	MRender 46.2 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 35.2 23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 134 135 25 2.8 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 285 Write 156 Mixed 203 SusWrite 78.9 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 22.9 95% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 57 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 53.9 42% 57 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 94%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 443GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 107 110 111 112 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 107 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 18.9 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	12	165	31.5"	1280 720	VSCEB3A VX3218-PC-MHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	423x
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	130x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	107x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	239x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	84x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	33x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	26x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,467 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16