Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190123
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 17:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 197
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 537
58% 460 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1042) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1289
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 33.8
27% 36.2 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 21.8
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria PLUS G2 SSD 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1258 1262 1322 1228 1247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 927
Write 1,375
Mixed 1135
SusWrite 1,239
266% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 23.6
104% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 909
662% 868 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 181%
Great: 311%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
524GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 141 135 144 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 91.9
Write 148
Mixed 64
SusWrite 132
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
127% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-054.A00G 859B BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 10% 60 212 59 95 21.7" 1536 864 AUO61ED
Typical ABRA A5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback