PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemPC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 14:36
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 63.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 243
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 849
81% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,259
78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 186
Parallax 173
137% 176 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 176
Splatting 120
110% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 403 412 404 403 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 182
Mixed 362
SusWrite 412
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 35.1
134% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 201
178% 263 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 23.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 8.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 557 460 60 23.8" 1920 1080 HWV2402 HUAWEI AD80HW
Typical X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,024
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback