PC MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemPC MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK MAXIMUS IX FORMULA
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 07:15
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 430
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 169
Parallax 181
137% 173 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 185
Splatting 126
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 631 593 577 514 405 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,187
Write 1,137
Mixed 772
SusWrite 568
257% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 40.6
160% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 892
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 820
609% 808 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 206%
Great: 353%
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397
228GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 424 448 459 468 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 384
Mixed 352
SusWrite 446
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 36.2
128% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 172
175% 283 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
100GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 112 112 114 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 91.6
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 112
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
82GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 81 138 133 149 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 141
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 134
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
628GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 76 75 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 77.8
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 75.9
94% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 25 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: PC MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback