Gigabyte GA-B650M K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M K  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 06:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$197
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 203
2-Core 395
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 710
8-Core 1,108
112% 909 Pts
64-Core 1,416
88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
ASRock(1849 5204) ≥ 4GB; phantom gaming
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 163
Parallax 369
137% 233 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 124
Splatting 194
165% 205 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 137%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NX-1TB 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: SVN9177
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2195 2218 2209 2234 2225 2218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 2,392
Mixed 2,058
SusWrite 2,216
493% 2,180 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 79
290% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 706
578% 833 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 346%
Great: 346%
Nx-512 2280 512GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11795
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,303
Write 2,458
Mixed 1,795
488% 2,186 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 85.6
303% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 1072
DQ Mixed 1,008
751% 985 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 51.6
148% 52 GB/s
SC Read 47.6
SC Write 54.4
SC Mixed 50.5
145% 50.8 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 145%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 5R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 36% 28 219 60 165 27" 1920 1080 MSI3CC6 MSI G27C7
Typical GA-B650M K Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback