User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIPASON
MotherboardIPASON B450MH
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 01:36
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 323
99% 187 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 936
98% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 28.4
16% 22.6 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 19.8
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZ 512GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 242 79 202 110 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 812
Mixed 142
SusWrite 136
149% 686 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 53.9
194% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 124
123% 207 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 145%
Great: 286%
Seagate PS4 Game Drive 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 37
Write 40.3
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 37.2
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.4
132% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 27.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACR02CA S271HL
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback