MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 00:45
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 602
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 123
Parallax 111
92% 116 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 120
Splatting 103
84% 102 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 248
Write 103
Mixed 287
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 21.5
84% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 166
152% 230 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
177GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 424
Mixed 410
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 40.1
139% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 325
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
890GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 175
Mixed 100
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra USB Type C 64GB
53GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 54.6
Mixed 71.4
98% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
171% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C17 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 17 164 1 165 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback