Zoostorm 9876-3526A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 9876-3526A  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160523
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 557
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 84.7
77% 89.1 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 70.8
59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R024G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 326 332 352 354 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 383
Write 362
Mixed 311
SusWrite 317
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 28
103% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 179
146% 201 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 93%
Fanxiang S100 512GB
118GB free
Firmware: SN14130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 341 334 349 341 339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 396
Write 394
Mixed 326
SusWrite 342
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 30.4
114% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 247
183% 238 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%
Fanxiang S501 1TB
412GB free
Firmware: U0806A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 303 306 321 322 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 329
Write 291
Mixed 286
SusWrite 312
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 19.5
122% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 270
220% 314 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 280%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
522GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 118 116 118 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 139
Write 139
Mixed 20
SusWrite 117
134% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 19.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF7 SAMSUNG
Typical 9876-3526A Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Zoostorm 9876-3526A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback