Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9012

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P9012  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D4022-A1
Memory42.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 10:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900-$310
CPU1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 51
1-Core 200
2-Core 396
107% 215 Pts
4-Core 751
8-Core 1,331
126% 1,041 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Device(1E26 0090) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 14
Parallax 10.2
7% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 9.8
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDKBA1T0TFH_1BC15ABFA 1TB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3428 3489 3444 3433 1783 1618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,638
Write 3,221
Mixed 2,326
SusWrite 2,866
676% 3,013 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 84.7
287% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1199
DQ Mixed 1,365
1,014% 1,344 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 469%
Great: 469%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU6CJR8N-XN Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC HMAA2GU6CJR8N-XN Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 64GB
3200, 2400, 3200, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 12
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 60 27" 2560 1440 FUS08DC B27-9 TS QHD
Typical ESPRIMO P9012 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9012

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback