Asus B400VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus B400VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK B400VC
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 05:34
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 99.9
38% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 159
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5200M
Asus(1043 2136) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.5
3% 2.1 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 10.56.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 298 276 293 344 335 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 284
Write 184
Mixed 135
SusWrite 300
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 7
26% 8.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 12.8
DQ Mixed 15.8
14% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 55%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 353 345 355 427 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 251
Write 271
Mixed 258
SusWrite 363
65% 286 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 128
92% 120 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KSN-4G Micron 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 60 14" 1280 720 CMN1482
Typical B400VC Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus B400VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback