Asus B400VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus B400VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK B400VC
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 02 '22 at 23:37
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 114
41% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 163
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5200M
Asus(1043 2136) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.8
3% 2.33 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.9
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 10.56.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 294 270 266 311 309 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 355
Write 196
Mixed 131
SusWrite 286
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 9.9
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 14
13% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 55%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 361 342 349 400 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 304
Write 321
Mixed 293
SusWrite 355
72% 318 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 36
106% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 156
160% 259 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KSN-4G Micron 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B400VC Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus B400VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback