| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A75M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120526 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 23 '17 at 04:24 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33.9%
Below average
|
31% 47.7 Pts
|
14% 103 Pts
|
7% 113 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Device(17AF 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
|
3.22%
Terrible
|
3% 4.29 fps
|
3% 3.58 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
60% 81.7 MB/s
|
64% 0.61 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 533 MHz
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
12% 4.23 GB/s
|
7% 2.43 GB/s
|
25% 160 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 18x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 10x |
| Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 8x |
| HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $407 |