Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 120
51% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 170
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 101
Parallax 114
94% 110 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 112
Splatting 95.1
89% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 363
Write 354
Mixed 138
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23.1
90% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 28.6
DQ Mixed 17.5
17% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
19GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 383
Mixed 24.8
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 1
56% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 44.8
53% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.3 8 341 257 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 444
Write 387
Mixed 17
SusWrite 105
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 0.2
23% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39%
Great: 100%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
114GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 90 86 80 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 88
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 84.1
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 119%
Packard Bell Carbon 2TB
52GB free, PID 002d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 53.3
Write 19.8
Mixed 16
SusWrite 26.1
34% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 1TB
480GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 92 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 94.8
Write 98.5
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 89.8
114% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 48 60 57.8" 1280 720 VES3700 50FHD_LCD_TV
Typical FM2A75M-HD+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback