Acer Veriton M6610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M6610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 10:31
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 135
59% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 234
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.Q3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 40
22% 31.4 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 30
Splatting 25.2
22% 27 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R024G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 154 128 59 132 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 332
Write 306
Mixed 263
SusWrite 121
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 18.6
65% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 128
118% 172 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 SUPERTALENT02 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 5 60 12.6" 1280 720 HIC0001
Typical Veriton M6610 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback