Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 02:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 373
47% 359 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 59.7
40% 48.6 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 24.8
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS2754D117-488 240GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS211101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 273 277 286 201 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 439
Write 268
Mixed 266
SusWrite 265
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 31.9
113% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 176
157% 236 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
495GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 167 164 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 119
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 167
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 25.6" 1280 720 HWP26F8 HP LP2475w
Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback