Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,102
99% 834 Pts
64-Core 2,175
135% 2,175 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Sapphire(1DA2 E437) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 168
Parallax 355
142% 232 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 134
Splatting 207
176% 218 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 143%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 412 312 24 47 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 498
Write 409
Mixed 402
SusWrite 221
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
22% 56 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 100%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
214GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 433 433 433 433 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 434
Mixed 323
SusWrite 433
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 39.6
139% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 166
127% 169 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 107%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4147 4426 4421 4423 4436 2234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
538% Outstanding
Read 3,004
Write 4,472
Mixed 3,409
SusWrite 4,015
846% 3,725 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 111
362% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,447
DQ Write 1,270
DQ Mixed 1,378
1,028% 1,365 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 538%
Great: 592%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
616GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3185 3191 3178 2542 1545 1554 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
435% Outstanding
Read 2,866
Write 3,240
Mixed 2,980
SusWrite 2,532
656% 2,905 MB/s
4K Read 73.7
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 103
332% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,321
DQ Mixed 1,397
1,048% 1,397 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 435%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4DFD832A.M16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 19
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 23.5" 1920 1080 IVM610E PL2481H
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback