Lenovo 10A90012MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10A90012MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory20.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 23:49
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 475
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 47.3
Parallax 51
38% 48.1 fps
MRender 48.1
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 32.2
34% 43 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4 4 4 4.1 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 79%
PNY ELITE 240GB
166GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.8 7.9 8.2 8.2 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 63%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
783GB free
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 66 66 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 65.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$88
158GB free
Firmware: PC2OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 62 62 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 61.7
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 60.6
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 59%
INTEL SS DSC2BF180A4L 180GB
93GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.6 8.6 8.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYF700 SONY AVAMP
Typical 10A90012MX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 10A90012MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback