Lenovo 10A90012MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10A90012MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory19.7 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '23 at 23:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 192
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 438
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 48.8
37% 46.5 fps
MRender 45.7
Gravity 47
Splatting 31.1
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.3 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 79%
PNY ELITE 240GB
164GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.9 7.6 8 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 63%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 57 54 62 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 143
Write 125
Mixed 106
SusWrite 61.5
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$88
158GB free
Firmware: PC2OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 39 58 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 45.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 55.3
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 59%
INTEL SS DSC2BF180A4L 180GB
93GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.2 8 8.2 8.3 8.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
110GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 36.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 28.2
50% 39 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.7
163% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A90012MX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 10A90012MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback