MSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C90
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 260
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 893
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,360
84% 1,360 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 131
Parallax 121
97% 124 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 124
Splatting 109
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 411 390 424 403 390 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 436
Mixed 375
SusWrite 385
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 49.3
152% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 237
206% 307 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 314 309 313 312 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 452
Mixed 381
SusWrite 309
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 49.8
164% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 364
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Hfs512g3 9TND-N210A 512GB
121GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 406 404 422 389 343 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 400
Write 429
Mixed 251
SusWrite 374
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 28.6
123% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 218
171% 232 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 92%
OOS1000G 1TB
704GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 132 133 134 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 133
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 110%
WD My Book 1170 3TB
1TB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 130 132 132 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 131
150% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3400C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 35.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 36 100 27" 1280 720 AOC2701 27G1G4
Typical MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90) Builds (Compare 2,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING CARBON WIFI (MS-7C90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback