Dell PowerEdge T330

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge T330
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T330  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 20:52
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 541
53% 434 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W4100
Dell(1028 2B1E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.Q2
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 11.4
6% 10.3 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 1TB
642GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 170 128 89 88 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 504
Write 186
Mixed 261
SusWrite 123
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.3
80% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 120%
WDC WD40EFPX-68C 4TB
911GB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 143 141 143 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.5% Poor
Read 155
Write 165
Mixed 154
SusWrite 142
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.3
19% 6.27 MB/s
DQ Read 2.4
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 3.2
3% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 41%
WD WD80EFZZ-68BTXN0 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 145 147 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
891GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 6 6.2 7.2 7.3 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD WD80EFZZ-68BTXN0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 190 192 192 189 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 121%
WD WD80EFZZ-68BTXN0 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 184 189 193 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GU7MFR8N-TF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 24" 1280 720 ACI2493 VE247
Typical PowerEdge T330 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback