Acer Aspire V3-575TG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-575TG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Zoro_SL
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151127
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 09 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 39.4
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 47.2
25% 39 Pts
4-Core 61.3
8-Core 73.2
9% 67.2 Pts
64-Core 92.1
6% 92.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 100C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 6
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 201 228 231 214 200 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 251
Write 231
Mixed 224
SusWrite 208
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 11.6
41% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 106
91% 132 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 101%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
7GB free, PID dd24
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 1.6 5.8 1.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 102
Write 9.2
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 3.4
27% 32 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 35 71 17 60 15.5" 1536 864 LGD04EA
Typical Aspire V3-575TG Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-575TG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback