Medion E14304

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion E14304  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NS1xAR
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 22:51
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 38.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 154
53% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 222
27% 208 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Device(1E39 A029) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 11.4
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 1TB
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 335 350 402 399 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 222
Write 26.6
Mixed 273
SusWrite 361
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 12.6
56% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 47.5
74% 139 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 14" 1536 864 NCP0052
Typical E14304 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E14304

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback