Alienware m17 R5 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAlienware m17 R5 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0XV7MX
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230714
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 22:32
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 42.2
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 51
26% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 94.2
8-Core 178
16% 136 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Dell(1028 0B5D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 45
Parallax 63.9
15% 42.4 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 26
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv1t02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 606 587 620 501 624 816 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 955
Write 1,267
Mixed 769
SusWrite 625
204% 904 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 20.2
71% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 145
108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 105%
Great: 451%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16GB 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5200 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 24.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 10 96 45 360 17.3" 1280 720 AUOAD9E
Typical m17 R5 AMD Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Alienware m17 R5 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback