Monster ABRA A5 V17.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.3
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220103
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 20:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 63.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 301
90% 173 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 882
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 1093
68% 1093 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 5015) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 80.5
80% 87.7 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 63.8
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00B07 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1884 2013 2091 2226 2229 2218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2065
Write 2,060
Mixed 1,899
SusWrite 2,110
459% 2,033 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 103
345% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,275
957% 1,279 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 376%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 14.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1536 864 LGD074D
Typical ABRA A5 V17.3 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback