Monster ABRA A5 V17.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive405% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.3
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220103
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 07:12
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 70.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 299
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,106
101% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,357
84% 1,357 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 5015) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3598
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 108
Reflection 85.9
Parallax 90.2
88% 94.7 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 72
Splatting 65.2
58% 71.5 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00B07 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2138 2226 2234 2258 2272 2274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
405% Outstanding
Read 2,130
Write 2,270
Mixed 2,064
SusWrite 2,234
491% 2,174 MB/s
4K Read 80.3
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 114
379% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,363
DQ Mixed 1,467
1,102% 1,474 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 405%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 17.5
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V17.3 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback