MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 16:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 141
50% 89 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 330
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 6.5
5% 35.7 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.9
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 73 63 84 75 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 508
Write 692
Mixed 528
SusWrite 98.3
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 21.9
77% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 381
263% 324 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 203%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
347GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 623 657 683 585 593 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 764
Write 955
Mixed 724
SusWrite 721
179% 791 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 25.3
88% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 419
324% 450 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 122%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 04CD F4-3200C22-8GRS 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 27 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback