HP ENVY TE01-2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY TE01-2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8860
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 07:43
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 49.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 300
85% 167 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 928
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
HP(103C 8860) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 13
Parallax 7.6
5% 8.93 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 1.7
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 806 400 403 407 408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,118
Write 1,146
Mixed 1064
SusWrite 570
219% 975 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 53.9
179% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 695
584% 858 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 177%
Great: 210%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 164 163 167 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 164
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kllisre 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 12.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 19 85 34.1" 3440 1440 GSM7767 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ENVY TE01-2xxx Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: HP ENVY TE01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback