Jingsha X99M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemJingsha X99M-H  (all builds)
Motherboard X99-D4
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 160
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 620
56% 468 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 264
Reflection 300
Parallax 339
215% 301 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 254
Splatting 190
210% 267 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 191%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 213 214 170 206 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 667
Mixed 524
SusWrite 219
129% 580 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 36.6
122% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 391
338% 503 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 113%
Great: 144%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 144 144 143 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 144
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 17.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
Typical X99M-H Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Jingsha X99M-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback