User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-AD4
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 16:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 734
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 1653
102% 1653 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 110
Parallax 68.3
57% 82.8 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 67.8
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S250G 250GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,406
Write 923
Mixed 799
230% 1,043 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 20.1
124% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 328
285% 416 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 274%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
11GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.1
Write 19.1
Mixed 6.7
21% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 26.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback