Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC7CJYHN
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 09:42
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4025
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 16.7
15% 20.7 Pts
4-Core 16.7
8-Core 21.2
2% 19 Pts
64-Core 16.8
1% 16.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.9
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Textorm B5 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 201 97 102 164 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 249
Write 198
Mixed 211
SusWrite 143
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 9
34% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 43.6
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 41.6
31% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TXS8G1M2666C19 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 257
16% 257 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 23 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2701 PA278QV
Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback