Lenovo 90FL0041MW

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 90FL0041MW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 364A
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '23 at 21:36
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$219 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 180 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 497 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 297 Parallax 220 166% 240 fps	MRender 251 Gravity 208 Splatting 168 166% 209 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GB 2,045 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT03L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 61 62 62 67 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 396 Write 176 Mixed 117 SusWrite 65.7 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 29.6 116% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 135 120% 185 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 113%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 80GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 308 312 318 318 315 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 377 Write 364 Mixed 370 SusWrite 319 81% 357 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 29 94% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 170 118% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 20.8 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 18.8 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 28: 0P 3R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	22%	55	212	59	144	27"	1920 1080	AOC2701 27G1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90FL0041MW Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Lenovo 90FL0041MW

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $71Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	47x
Core i7-6700Intel $219Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 90%, 2,045 samples	24x
LCH-256V2S 256GBLiteonBench 78%, 2,710 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	16x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	7x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16