HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8703
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 20:21
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 74.7
38% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 99.9
8-Core 170
16% 135 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
HP(103C 88D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 97
Reflection 133
Parallax 313
79% 181 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 256
Splatting 188
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 118%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 1039 1049 1034 1070 671 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 956
Write 1,275
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 980
240% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 20.3
70% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 95.8
71% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 124%
Great: 332%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
521GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 1122 1158 1183 1167 1204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 1,074
Mixed 1,070
SusWrite 1,169
257% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 19.9
68% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 96.1
73% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 147%
Great: 438%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
740GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 173 172 173 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 177
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 171
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 108%
ASMT 2105 2TB
105GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 100 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 94.7
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 97.9
122% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
62% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 6200 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 15.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 45 60 34" 1280 720 AUS3435 ASUS VG34V
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback