HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8703
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 15:40
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 188
59% 109 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 154
15% 121 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
HP(103C 88D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 210
Parallax 348
105% 229 fps
MRender 347
Gravity 254
Splatting 187
206% 263 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 132%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 1129 1245 1050 411 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,064
Write 1,647
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 870
273% 1,204 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 44.3
139% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 330
238% 308 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 153%
Great: 332%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
522GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1511 1757 1572 1711 1631 1702 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,295
Write 1,228
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 1,647
293% 1,299 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 34.1
119% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 290
225% 302 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 203%
Great: 438%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
740GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 140 139 143 141 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 141
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 108%
ASMT 2105 2TB
105GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 98 99 95 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 73.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 98.6
120% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 6200 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 46 60 34" 3440 1440 AUS3435 ASUS VG34V
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback